Advertisement

You will be redirected to the page you want to view in  seconds.

House panel seeks to halt controversial Army hair regulations

May. 7, 2014 - 06:00AM   |  
(Army)
  • Filed Under

Black women aren’t the only group who have a problem with the Army’s new hairstyle standards — House lawmakers don’t like them either.

As part of its annual defense authorization bill mark up on Wednesday, the House Armed Services Committee added language to prohibit the department from enforcing the new hair rules.

Instead, lawmakers want a full review of the plans, including “the opinions of those who may have religious accommodation requirements and minorities serving in the Armed Forces.”

Last month, thousands of soldiers and civilians launched an unsuccessful White House petition compelling the president to order a review of the new appearance and grooming regulations, charging they were “racially biased” against black women.

The rules forbid twists or multiple braids bigger than a quarter of an inch in diameter, dreadlocks of any style, and uneven or oversized cornrows.

Army officials defended the regulations, arguing they are needed to ensure uniformity and functionality with military headgear. They also said minorities were involved in crafting the new rules, to ensure the end result wasn’t racially biased.

Former Sgt. Jasmine Jacobs, who launched the White House petition that sparked an online controversy and drew national attention to the issue, said she is excited by the development.

“It’s really inspiring,” she said. “I just hope it becomes more the norm as far as in the future when there’s a new regulation ... it’s [set] by a more diverse committee so it’s not retroactive, and we can be more proactive.”

Jacobs said she hopes that in the future “the regulations would be fair for females of all different races.”

“The Army has a chance to take advantage of this educational moment and come out on top,” she said. “I’m excited to see where this goes.”

The Senate would have to adopt the House’s regulation ban before it could become law. Leaders from the Senate Armed Services Committee are expected to offer their draft of the annual authorization bill later this month.

The House language also prohibits other services from adopting similar standards, and requires the Defense Department to report back to Congress on the results of their review.

Staff writer Michelle Tan contributed to this report.

Answers by RallyPoint

Join trending discussions in the military's #1 professional community. See what members like yourself have to say from across the DoD.

More In News

Start your day with a roundup of top defense news.

VA Home Loan
Rates

Search By:

Product Options:
Zip Code:

News for your in-box

Sign up now for free Military Times E-Reports. Choose from Money and Education. Subscribers: log in for premium e-newsletters.


This Week's Air Force Times

This Week's Air Force Times

Best federal contractors
The companies hiring the most veterans now

Subscribe for Print or Digital delivery today!

Classifieds
MilitaryTimes Green Trusted Classifieds Looking to buy, sell and connect on Military Times?
Browse expanded listings across hundreds of military installations.
Faces of valorHonoring those who fought and died in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom.
hall of valorThe Hall of Valor is a searchable database of valor award citations collected by Doug Sterner, a Vietnam veteran and Military Times contributing editor, and by Military Times staff.
Woman who cried rape
(3 replies)
   Last Post: TJMAC77SP
        May 3, 2014 1:32 PM
   Last Post: garhkal
        May 1, 2014 5:03 PM
Cliven Bundy
(45 replies)
   Last Post: Chief_KO
        Apr 26, 2014 9:49 AM
Handbooks

All you need to know about your military benefits.

Benefits handbook

Guard & Reserve All you need to know about the Guard & Reserve.

guard and reserve handbook