Advertisement

You will be redirected to the page you want to view in  seconds.

Lawsuit challenges combat exclusion for women

May. 25, 2012 - 02:15PM   |   Last Updated: May. 25, 2012 - 02:15PM  |  
  • Filed Under

A team from the University of Virginia law school is suing the Pentagon for excluding women from combat units on behalf of two female Army reservists who say their careers were stymied by the policy.

Command Sgt. Maj. Jane Baldwin and Col. Ellen Haring both argue in the lawsuit that they have been shut out of promotions and desirable jobs for which they were otherwise well qualified either because they were banned by the exclusion policy from serving in those units, or because the combat exclusion prevented them from getting vital career experience.

The suit, filed in the federal U.S. District Court of Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, is the first of its kind, according to law professor Anne Coughlin, who is spearheading the effort.

"There haven't been any cases challenging the combat exclusion policy directly, and that's astonishing to us as academic lawyers," Coughlin said. "This looked like a lawsuit waiting to happen to me for quite a long time."

The Supreme Court last addressed combat exclusion issues in 1981, when it ruled that sex discrimination in Selective Service registration was constitutional because women were unable to serve in combat units. Coughlin noted that combat has changed dramatically over the past three decades, and even the Defense Department has acknowledged that women today have often been placed in combat situations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"Everyone seems to agree, including the Pentagon, that the combat exclusion policy needs to be revamped," Coughlin said. "We believe it should be scrapped altogether."

She acknowledged that the lawsuit will have to meet a high bar, given the historic reluctance of federal courts to interfere with military policy. Both racial segregation and the "don't ask, don't tell" law on gays in uniform were ended not by the ruling of a court, but by voluntary changes in military policy through Pentagon leaders and Congress.

However, Coughlin said the courts have at least acknowledged in the past that they have a right to hold military policy up to constitutional standards if they are clearly in violation.

"The federal courts have been very deferential to the military," she admitted. "At the same time, they've taken these cases. They've never said, ‘Hands off'.' "

Answers by RallyPoint

Join trending discussions in the military's #1 professional community. See what members like yourself have to say from across the DoD.

More In News

Start your day with a roundup of top defense news.

VA Home Loan
Rates

Search By:

Product Options:
Zip Code:

News for your in-box

Sign up now for free Military Times E-Reports. Choose from Money and Education. Subscribers: log in for premium e-newsletters.


This Week's Air Force Times

This Week's Air Force Times

System breakdown?
Tech made chief in 7 years despite 2006 conviction

Subscribe for Print or Digital delivery today!

Classifieds
MilitaryTimes Green Trusted Classifieds Looking to buy, sell and connect on Military Times?
Browse expanded listings across hundreds of military installations.
Faces of valorHonoring those who fought and died in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom.
hall of valorThe Hall of Valor is a searchable database of valor award citations collected by Doug Sterner, a Vietnam veteran and Military Times contributing editor, and by Military Times staff.
Woman who cried rape
(3 replies)
   Last Post: TJMAC77SP
        May 3, 2014 1:32 PM
   Last Post: garhkal
        May 1, 2014 5:03 PM
Cliven Bundy
(45 replies)
   Last Post: Chief_KO
        Apr 26, 2014 9:49 AM
Handbooks

All you need to know about your military benefits.

Benefits handbook

Guard & Reserve All you need to know about the Guard & Reserve.

guard and reserve handbook